Can this prove that text was written by AI?

No. The AI Content Detector returns an advisory likelihood estimate, not proof. Use it as one review signal alongside human judgment, drafting history, citations, source context, and editorial review.

What evidence does the detector analyze?

It reviews visible writing signals: repeated phrasing, sentence rhythm, generic wording, lack of concrete specificity, formulaic structure, and unusually consistent style. The result explains these signals instead of returning only a label.

What do the paragraph notes mean?

Segment notes show where individual paragraphs look more human-written, mixed, or AI-assisted. They help you inspect the evidence locally instead of treating the whole document as one flat score.

Can AI detector results be wrong?

Yes. Human writing, second-language writing, translated text, edited AI drafts, templates, and polished business or academic writing can all produce mixed or misleading signals.

Is the AI Content Detector free?

Signed-in free accounts get shared monthly AI trial actions. Pro users can use the larger monthly AI limits on their plan.

AI Content Detector - Check AI-Written Text Online

AI Content Detector

AI detection that explains the evidence.

The AI Content Detector is designed for careful review, not accusations. It estimates AI-assisted likelihood from visible writing signals, shows confidence and limitations, and breaks the result down by paragraph so you can interpret the text responsibly.

4.1 Estimate

Start with a cautious likelihood, not a verdict

Get an advisory AI probability, human probability, confidence level, language hint, and summary that clearly frames the result as an estimate rather than proof.

Advisory estimate Mixed signals

48%likely AI-assisted

Mixed or edited

The text contains some formulaic phrasing, but concrete details and varied rhythm prevent a confident AI-only assessment.

Confidence: LowLanguage: English

4.2 Evidence

See the signals behind the score

Review repeated phrasing, sentence rhythm, generic wording, specificity, structure, and stylistic consistency so the score is traceable to visible writing patterns.

Evidence signals 6 signals

Repeated phrasing42

Sentence rhythm58

Generic wording64

Specific detail22

Structural pattern35

Stylistic consistency51

4.3 Context

Inspect paragraph-level notes before acting

Segment notes show where the text looks more human, mixed, or AI-assisted, with reminders that edited AI drafts, translated text, and second-language writing can create misleading signals.

Where in your text Paragraph notes

18%Human-like

Specific context and varied sentence length reduce AI-like evidence.

46%Mixed

Some polished phrasing appears, but the paragraph includes concrete constraints.

73%AI-assisted

Generic transitions and very even pacing create a stronger AI-like signal.

AI detector results are estimates, not proof.

Evidence-first review

The detector explains why it scored the text instead of returning a black-box AI label.

Multilingual caution

Language-aware summaries support English, Turkish, and mixed-language drafts without treating polish as proof.

Responsible interpretation

Built-in limitations discourage using AI detection as the sole basis for academic, hiring, or disciplinary decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about ai content detector.

Review AI signals responsibly with Pro.

Upgrade to Pro